Far Cry 2 was one of the most expected games this holiday season, promising to bring back the same great shooter experience as well as the fabulous graphics and highly detailed world of the first title. Ubisoft heavily marketed this game and said that it would completely change the way players looked at other shooters, setting a benchmark that would be hard to match
The game was promoted as a spiritual successor to the firstFar Cry, as almost everything changed – the main character wasn't the same ex-marine dressed in a Hawaiian shirt, the tropical island surroundings were replaced with a violent African country, and even the development team was different, with Ubisoft Montreal taking the place of Crytek. So, with all these changes, can fans call this game a true successor to Far Cry 2, or will it be just another shooter that will capitalize on the reputation of the original title?
The game was promoted as a spiritual successor to the firstFar Cry, as almost everything changed – the main character wasn't the same ex-marine dressed in a Hawaiian shirt, the tropical island surroundings were replaced with a violent African country, and even the development team was different, with Ubisoft Montreal taking the place of Crytek. So, with all these changes, can fans call this game a true successor to Far Cry 2, or will it be just another shooter that will capitalize on the reputation of the original title?
No comments:
Post a Comment